From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 12:27:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F9716A4CE for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:27:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from citrine.spiritone.com (citrine.spiritone.com [216.99.193.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9D643D1F for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:27:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ppi@amug.org) Received: from wyeth.trail.calm (216-99-194-253.dial.spiritone.com [216.99.194.253])i1CKRWpJ029292 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:27:32 -0800 Received: from wyeth.trail.calm (localhost.trail.calm [127.0.0.1]) by wyeth.trail.calm (8.12.9p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1CKbmPY027001 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:37:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ppi@amug.org) Received: (from mark@localhost) by wyeth.trail.calm (8.12.9p2/8.12.8/Submit) id i1CKbkCJ027000 for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:37:46 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: wyeth.trail.calm: mark set sender to ppi@amug.org using -f Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:37:45 -0800 From: ppi@amug.org To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040212203745.GU20527@wyeth.trail.calm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.4 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Subject: Hardware vs software firewall on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 20:27:22 -0000 I'm upgrading the hardware on my webserver. It will run FreeBSD 4.9. I need to decide whether to use a hardware firewall (Cisco) or use ipfw, ipf, pf, etc. The hardware firewall will increase my monthly server rental bill by almost 30%. So I'm wondering if the significant extra cost is worth it. What kind of performance hit will result from using ipfw, ipf or pf? I would like to avoid the extra expense of the hardware firewall. Can anyone offer an opinion on this matter? Any good reasons to use one over the other? Mark L.