From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 25 04:09:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8729F16A402 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 04:09:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from el-out-1112.google.com (el-out-1112.google.com [209.85.162.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9007613C457 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 04:09:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: by el-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id r27so1153873ele.3 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:09:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=V/gF3cVex/ADAh0QbpPGX5S3vExWT67SIa3lUIi4G6k=; b=OVybE37WvX/7d3G3oN75Yqy02+iQpZOxePm8dQIQ4U/wtAHc+qfSMn2jD9SjU93LbBjVUf/ngKEl4gB4CwvYruWaLu8IUXCC9Ei1CBiJWORckKQ7QTp4H2JjE7KWKnsFNgAlZRSnYj9vSAanH/7fvtlWj2lg5PfiaPIS88IWpb4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=cSWILbt9mHgV4YKGn4PZrwQqE6HlV1CjQJtkxj+fg2x6qhdu/T8Wk+xSXtJBvTM3BjlaNMT2OWhVgmrteoKTJ/BbgFcBKAZcFA2W9O+3x55Qlx1G01xt+xfso1bccfhPXnwG3NhQRwm+h+Gth1u4oM9duHHdEkylehbOv9VFzgQ= Received: by 10.142.215.5 with SMTP id n5mr1765710wfg.11.1203912588168; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:09:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr ( [211.53.35.84]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 30sm8167304wff.11.2008.02.24.20.09.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:09:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (localhost.cdnetworks.co.kr [127.0.0.1]) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id m1P49eIt044258 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:09:40 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: (from yongari@localhost) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id m1P49a3t044257; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:09:36 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:09:36 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon To: Raul Message-ID: <20080225040936.GG42733@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20080221050635.GC26427@cdnetworks.co.kr> <47BDBB1A.9040701@andric.com> <47BE2FEF.7010709@andric.com> <20080222041715.GA30497@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20080222054103.GD30497@cdnetworks.co.kr> <47BF6455.2020603@pop.isdefe.es> <20080223023142.GA35336@cdnetworks.co.kr> <47C01818.2090704@pop.isdefe.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47C01818.2090704@pop.isdefe.es> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: Packet corruption in re0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 04:09:50 -0000 On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 01:56:56PM +0100, Raul wrote: > Pyun YongHyeon escribi?: > > [....] > > > >Download if_re.c and if_rlreg.h in the following URL and rebuild the > > > >driver. > > > >http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/7.0R/if_re.c > > > >http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/7.0R/if_rlreg.h > > > > > > I've tested it against my 'netcat | tar' and it improves as it takes > > > four iterations (instead of one) to fall down (nearly unusable). I've > > > not run it so many times in a row on CURRENT. Must I try it again?. > > > That's what pciconf says about my re0: > > > > > > re0@pci0:2:15:0: class=0x020000 card=0xe0001458 chip=0x816710ec > > > rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 > > > > > > >How about disabling checksum offload on re0 side? > > After 6 iterations everything looked good so I started to do other > things while the netcat was running (build ports). Shortly after > (seconds), the problems appear again. Now, I'm not sure how reliable the > testing procedure is and there are other issues with the chipset (AMD > 690G), usb support problems, the sata subsystem is not well recognized > ... I've seen also problems on this box while using em0 so too complex > environment to isolate the possible re0 problem. While I'll be glad to > test whatever you ask me for, too loose ends on this box nowadays. > Sorry, no clue yet. I guess seeing smiliar issues on other network interfaces would indicate the problem is in other area. If you can isolate re(4) issues please let me know asap. > Regards, > Raul -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon