From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 21 01:04:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5DA1065694 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 01:04:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swell.k@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E8C8FC16 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 01:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so5002495wyj.13 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:04:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:references :date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=LAw3+fhk9hALPLjWFdUdPrdNr6uTQ61VqxI2cG90rw0=; b=evEl+D6HTz1qgNHrKpDcZJY2A0ywOhgKqdM5uSG1dr52Uzf2NWd6eFpuw2XbHSWERa VtG/lTn0PLJ3n4fhvCWJ0yXgb5HPKtcwFnB14kW2owAFUieT5E2PsMAKq5eJ4P4fEsNh WNH5rBJEfMY/g9rW5CsfTyEA+j7EXRa7evSj4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=BjqA9Kc/1xiI2MzHfEUsvC4uRkNYTCVHj6zWI97GQKYMD3f/Onwbs7RvRyEoysdqve 6k+Ogx0EcTJDmSrXi/t0LsmL4BIwJtRMugbuWNJm1gmlduoO7UTfaRwpPvAbC4wcM4Dq EW7fwShUXw63iwD+G3G2Nl61C/JBi5HyRZvvs= Received: by 10.227.138.146 with SMTP id a18mr1914184wbu.151.1282352697738; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:04:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (spftor1.privacyfoundation.de [87.118.104.203]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m25sm3001607wbc.7.2010.08.20.18.04.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:04:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Anonymous To: Atom Smasher References: <1008211213030.2000@smasher> Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 05:04:42 +0400 In-Reply-To: <1008211213030.2000@smasher> (Atom Smasher's message of "Sat, 21 Aug 2010 12:19:24 +1200 (NZST)") Message-ID: <8639u822tx.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: intel i5 - core? or core2? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 01:04:59 -0000 Atom Smasher writes: > hardware: > MACH: x86_64 (LENOVO, 4313CTO, ThinkPad T510) > CPU: x86_64 (Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU M 540 @ 2.53GHz) > > FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #0 (amd64) > > in "/etc/make.conf" i tried setting "CPUTYPE=core" but as soon as i > start building things, lang/perl5.10 fails, complaining about "core" > not being right. > > when i change the setting to "CPUTYPE=core2" it builds fine. I'd suggest using CPUTYPE?=native and let the compiler decide what's best. Our pretty old gcc in base supports neither `core' nor `core2'. The `core2' is just an alias for `nocona'/`prescott' for amd64/i386. And `core' alias is available only for i386, cf. bsd.cpu.mk. > > is something wrong? i thought the i5 was "core", not "core2"...?