From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed May 16 21:45:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB6E37B423 for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 21:45:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f4H4ghX07194; Wed, 16 May 2001 23:42:43 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 23:42:42 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Arun Sharma Cc: FreeBSD Hackers Subject: Re: MxN threads on Linux Message-ID: <20010516234242.A5242@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20010516194725.A5306@sharmas.dhs.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i In-Reply-To: <20010516194725.A5306@sharmas.dhs.org>; from "Arun Sharma" on Wed May 16 19:47:25 GMT 2001 X-OS: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In the last episode (May 16), Arun Sharma said: > Ran into this on freshmeat today: > > http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/pthreads/ > > Why isn't the FreeBSD equivalent happening on a public cvs branch ? > I'm not demanding that it should happen that way, just curious about > the reasons :) Probably because the coders are waiting for SMPng to stabilize a bit before working on threads. Once work starts, it will be visible to all in CVS, just like SMPng is now. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@emsphone.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message