From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Oct  7 12:44:06 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA21549
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 7 Oct 1996 12:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pcpsj.pfcs.com (harlan.fred.net [205.252.219.31])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA21520;
          Mon, 7 Oct 1996 12:44:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mumps.pfcs.com (mumps.pfcs.com [192.52.69.11]) by pcpsj.pfcs.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id PAA12262; Mon, 7 Oct 1996 15:43:52 -0400
Received: from localhost by mumps.pfcs.com with SMTP id AA08063
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5); Mon, 7 Oct 1996 15:43:51 -0400
To: hackers@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: random() fix explanation to avoid misunderstanding 
In-Reply-To: Terry's message of "Mon, 07 Oct 1996 11:27:36 PDT."
             <199610071827.LAA14499@phaeton.artisoft.com> 
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 1996 15:43:50 -0300
Message-Id: <8061.844717430@mumps.pfcs.com>
From: Harlan Stenn <Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Terry is right when he talk about needing to keep the PSEUDO-random code
"golden".

Jordan is right when he says that if you want repeatable results, it's
best to carry your pseudo-random number code with you.

If folks are going to change random.c anyway, I'd ask that either the
old code be moved to a "compat" library, and/or find a way to have a
per-process switch that provides a way to choose which version of the
generator you're getting.

H