From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Jan 1 13: 7:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B20BB37B420; Tue, 1 Jan 2002 13:07:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA20921; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 08:07:22 +1100 Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 08:07:18 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: To: John Baldwin Cc: Michal Mertl , , Matthew Dillon , Alfred Perlstein Subject: Re: 64 bit counters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020102080550.B11165-100000@gamplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, John Baldwin wrote: > On 31-Dec-01 Michal Mertl wrote: > > I've almost finished the changes to implement interface counters with > > atomic_t which is either 32 bit or 64 bit. I'll finish it anyway. It can > > at least be converted to atomic_add_int (instead of my WIP name > > atomic_add_max and friends) and it will help someone later to be able to > > get rid of giant protection. I may be wrong even with this - well if > > that's going to be the case and otherwise there will be no use for my > > changes, they can always be forgotten. I could take it as practice lesson > > on hacking kernel sources :-). > > I really need to fix the atomic(9) API to use sizeof() instead of explicit > types like Bruce wants. :) This will be easier when there is only one size :-). Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message