From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 20:28:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2699616A425; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 20:28:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pittgoth.com (ns1.pittgoth.com [216.38.206.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F51643D64; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 20:28:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (ip68-105-180-11.dc.dc.cox.net [68.105.180.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k14L9PBV086189 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 4 Feb 2006 16:09:26 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 15:28:15 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes To: kmacy@fsmware.com Message-Id: <20060204152815.15ee487a.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: References: <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> <86bqxntixy.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060204.085134.44793895.imp@bsdimp.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:41:21 +0000 Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, harti@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, kris@obsecurity.org, imp@bsdimp.com Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:28:36 -0000 On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 08:48:28 -0800 Kip Macy wrote: > IIRC, at NetApp -O2 was the default for all builds. I think it is safe to > say that the generated code is quite stable. If -O2 allows the compiler to > catch errors earlier it should be the default. > I concur. -- Tom Rhodes