From owner-cvs-all  Mon Jun 12 16: 8:45 2000
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5B41237BC23; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 16:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mjacob@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from mjacob@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id QAA31504;
	Mon, 12 Jun 2000 16:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mjacob@FreeBSD.org)
Message-Id: <200006122308.QAA31504@freefall.freebsd.org>
From: Matt Jacob <mjacob@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 16:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/isp isp_freebsd.c
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

mjacob      2000/06/12 16:08:35 PDT

  Modified files:
    sys/dev/isp          isp_freebsd.c 
  Log:
  Fix breakage to target mode support.
  
  What we'd like to know is whether or not we have a listener
  upstream that really hasn't configured yet. If we do, then
  we can give a more sensible reply here. If not, then we can
  reject this out of hand.
  
  Choices for what to send were
  	Not Ready, Unit Not Self-Configured Yet
  	(0x2,0x3e,0x00)
  for the former and
  	Illegal Request, Logical Unit Not Supported
  	(0x5,0x25,0x00)
  for the latter.
  
  We used to decide whether there was at least one listener
  based upon whether the black hole driver was configured.
  
  However, recent config(8) changes have made this hard to do
  at this time.
  
  Actually, we didn't use the above quite yet, but were sure considering it.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.37      +26 -15    src/sys/dev/isp/isp_freebsd.c



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message