From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Jul 21 16:00:18 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA18203
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 16:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bitbox.follo.net (eivind@bitbox.follo.net [194.198.43.36])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA18136;
          Mon, 21 Jul 1997 15:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) id AAA13640; Tue, 22 Jul 1997 00:59:29 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 1997 00:59:29 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <199707212259.AAA13640@bitbox.follo.net>
From: Eivind Eklund <perhaps@yes.no>
To: hcremean@vt.edu
CC: brian@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Lee Cremeans's message of Sun, 13 Jul 1997 23:29:00 -0400
Subject: Re: PPP -alias and DCC RESUME
References: <19970713232900.32111@wakky.dyn.ml.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> I noticed something tonight: The alias_irc.c in ppp-970620 and 970629 doesn't
> seem to handle DCC RESUME (a mIRCism that's supported by the EPIC versions
> of ircII) correctly. When I turn off aliasing, things work, but from the
> looks of the code in alias_irc.c, it should be working even with aliasing
> ON. 

Does DCC SEND work for you with aliasing enabled?  If it does, then
"DCC RESUME" likely break the common format for DCC commands.  I can
probably modify the alias_irc.c code to handle 'DCC RESUME' as a
special case, but I would need some form of specs for it; at least a
trace of an IRC session where it is used (raw form).  You can get hold
of me as 'EE' on IRCnet if you have access to the client; I no longer
have the facilities to easily test aliased connections (though I might
set it up again later).

Eivind.