From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jul  2 14:57:16 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A43CA16A476
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon,  2 Jul 2007 14:57:16 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 929F513C447
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon,  2 Jul 2007 14:57:16 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [192.168.0.97] (c-76-21-32-5.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.21.32.5])
	by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72CC71A3C1A;
	Mon,  2 Jul 2007 07:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4688EBC2.8070703@ybb.ne.jp>
References: <46806B3E.2060701@FreeBSD.org> <4688EBC2.8070703@ybb.ne.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <27D8F2CD-156E-4962-A187-63E42CAE2B6F@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Suleiman Souhlal <ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 07:57:06 -0700
To: Takeharu KATO <takeharu1219@ybb.ne.jp>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Machine Check Architecture on amd64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 14:57:16 -0000


On Jul 2, 2007, at 5:12 AM, Takeharu KATO wrote:

> Hi, Souhlal
>
>> I would appreciate it if someone would try this, especially if you  
>> have Intel machines with bad RAM.
>> Comments are welcome.
>
> Apparently, the patch does not have memory scrub facility.
> Do you have a plan to implement the memory scrub facility like  
> solaris does?
>
> P.S. In fact, I was also trying to implement the MCE facility, so I  
> am interesting to
> your patch.

While I don't know about Intel CPUs, K8 CPUs from AMD have a hardware  
DRAM/data cache scrubber, so I didn't bother implementing it, and I  
don't really plan to, at least in the near future. It should,  
however, be pretty easy to implement.

-- Suleiman