Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 15:48:34 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> To: Kubilay Kocak <koobs@freebsd.org> Cc: Torsten Zuehlsdorff <freebsd@toco-domains.de>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-head <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r504590 - in head/net: samba46 samba47 samba48 Message-ID: <20190702154834.GA20858@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <6e7e1418-8a5e-d5f2-3cbc-69a224549241@FreeBSD.org> References: <CALdFvJHK0aBF6oLTFNnTiUyrmFUHCPYm3-k7S3_-FpYTHW4WSA@mail.gmail.com> <F208C261-18D8-4E5A-BABE-A9E6D8A52B5B@FreeBSD.org> <CALdFvJENynqPAkKSf5ueuG2nBMr9tckikzZOQv9caXtgcwZg4A@mail.gmail.com> <20190702102316.wv6w5u2ilfaw6vrd@atuin.in.mat.cc> <d9d37be2-8279-af6a-1283-67f25f4f8835@toco-domains.de> <20190702111647.vozqzf4gnqbajvcl@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20190702142827.120588a0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <122bd115-6a91-bf50-f23a-75871d193cb7@FreeBSD.org> <2f784971-9a27-d904-4d04-52a620db0a3e@toco-domains.de> <6e7e1418-8a5e-d5f2-3cbc-69a224549241@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 01:35:14AM +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > ... > Yes the process is not well understood by all, but this is a natural > outcome of people avoiding the process, because its not entirely clear > what the point is, because the messaging has been unclear from the > start. We still have veteren developers asking what should and shouldn't > be merged. This is the most obvious sign of a knowledge and/or > expectations gap. The correct way out of this mess is what had been said before on numerous occasion: stable/security/quarterly branches should be operated by ports- secteam@ or however it's called, not by the individual committers. This would solve *all* the problems of what and how to merge because dedicated team would know better and coordinate its action only within itself. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190702154834.GA20858>