From nobody Wed Jul 12 13:29:24 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4R1JVw6khtz2tpDW for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 13:29:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4R1JVv6RHgz3FMD for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 13:29:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=f-m.fm header.s=fm2 header.b=OeYsdb1l; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=O1v591w+; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of void@f-m.fm designates 66.111.4.26 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=void@f-m.fm; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=f-m.fm Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB125C00A8 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 09:29:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 12 Jul 2023 09:29:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=f-m.fm; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1689168566; x=1689254966; bh=Ax Q8lYhbcLJ4aNdSi7tBQq4M0zLnYBfqnxrk3JSsrJM=; b=OeYsdb1lUFKOZ0wU/y GykzmPXfwSYC/sJlIs2wivrad7ORxAHu2t1ucKPpy+I3zEdO0gBDgiKXeDTapZvY 2JNqeBwRZAPZEXZWiEX0qUJPAKXqBIYDuAhyMPAAznUCIZOtBIYrQp3dfp3Th0sG hxYxqb4monUuMzAOCYVok13BIId5gw23ZBTmaeIenaPOT4vxMZZmrDsVvr1HvU7z X3RXgLaGqKBh5UJYKERS5BP7Ub11lL/oMqJaub4xdjqd3dwkPIDlvcXylBT047TN 0Ac5atEE7rynzkP00WyaWiHa9uWXO1852jgeHIB3TzFkHDpnlloxbB/YxzXHanaw bw8w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1689168566; x=1689254966; bh=AxQ8lYhbcLJ4a NdSi7tBQq4M0zLnYBfqnxrk3JSsrJM=; b=O1v591w+F7Da54c28CJxX7GPiHhqQ cfk+pSehMTTQ/GwPrBuEPeh4qpX8e39btwMfiwhE4yqppsvJrt/i7xBxPUr/HDPL 0FSLoJQ3oYONsgXfFV1AeoaMtY8AT2CTirfVxMoX3DQDATZxPp6AueG6XkiwXhLO U0iqbFM6Gvy95IXS2N8i5q5Yd9M640vbdmV8LMTJX/p+Py9qK5iylzA56IyHmHYn TIFP0BnyRcyRFY+W5Iz9SmXtJiV/1PnW7l5544QInCGSTt/7gpuD0P2Ys64Klicc xynvrYUQ9pVm32QMcTucigHn25XRuRYfRSaIoldDK9LXP8fyzq5Mh/0sQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedviedrfedvgdeiiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertd dttddvnecuhfhrohhmpehvohhiugcuoehvohhiugesfhdqmhdrfhhmqeenucggtffrrght thgvrhhnpeekleduvdelhfeileefgffghfffkedtheellefgudfgvdegkeejjedutdehhe fgueenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehv ohhiugesfhdqmhdrfhhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i2541463c:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 09:29:25 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 14:29:24 +0100 From: void To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cc_vegas isn't built in recent current Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 15.00]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.94)[-0.943]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[f-m.fm,none]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[f-m.fm:s=fm2,messagingengine.com:s=fm2]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.26]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.14)[0.140]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(-0.10)[66.111.4.26:from]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[66.111.4.26:from]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:19151, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[f-m.fm:+,messagingengine.com:+]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4R1JVv6RHgz3FMD X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 01:42:03PM +0100, void wrote: (cc_vegas) I notice that on -current the default is cc_cubic so will roll with that for now. Unless there's an algo that better suits FTTP which has spiky latency. --