Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:10:04 +0900 From: Eric Kjeldergaard <kjelderg@gmail.com> To: Takashi Inoue <takash-i@sophia.ac.jp> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cpufreq on 5.4R Message-ID: <d9175cad05053100105044c07b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <429BCC04.3080207@sophia.ac.jp> References: <429ADD9D.90506@sophia.ac.jp> <429B6A8E.1070906@root.org> <429BCC04.3080207@sophia.ac.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2005/5/31, Takashi Inoue <takash-i@sophia.ac.jp>: <snip> =20 > I see. I'll also try cvsup current cpufreq when I have time. > By the way, I cannot see the difference between est and ichss. > Should I use est insted of ichss? ThinkPad X40 has an Intel i855GME > chipset. > I thought I can use either est or ichss and ichss is better. > Maybe I'm confused. I think EST is for Pentium-M and ichss for the other pentiums. --=20 If I write a signature, my emails will appear more personalised.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d9175cad05053100105044c07b>