Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 08:41:32 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 280648] Traffic leak between fibs Message-ID: <bug-280648-7501-nVd9g6U9cD@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-280648-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-280648-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D280648 --- Comment #14 from Tatsuki Makino <tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com> --- Hmmm.... :) I don't know how far the fib that can be set on the network interface will = be used, but if it cannot be set at least there, it will be difficult to route packet forwarding (which sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding is set to 1). A process launched in an environment where the fib is 0 inherits that the f= ib is 0. If the process switches FIBs in the middle, setfib or setsockopt should be running somewhere, but in that case, there is a config for that somewhere. I don't think there is a function to recognize the FIB of the network inter= face where the packet arrived and select the FIB of the packet to be sent. [cita= tion needed] ...Therefore, it seems that the service for packets passing through the rou= te of fib 1 should be set to use fib 1. single-mindedly :) And since lo0 is also a route that can be passed through various ways, it is sometimes better to create lo1 or lo2 and separate them. I don't know if it really is. I think that's what it means, but I don't think it's on target :) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-280648-7501-nVd9g6U9cD>