From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 8 21:53:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB9016A548; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 21:53:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB75449AE; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 19:32:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k58JW78A093757; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 23:32:07 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 23:32:07 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Tom Rhodes In-Reply-To: <20060607194300.7565e832.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <20060608233110.R93122@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <200606070333.k573XmRc067920@repoman.freebsd.org> <200606071051.47070.jhb@freebsd.org> <20060607194300.7565e832.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 08 Jun 2006 23:32:07 +0400 (MSD) Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, John Baldwin Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile README X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 21:53:42 -0000 On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Tom Rhodes wrote: TR> > I thought the obfuscation was intentional as very few people should be doing TR> > a 'make world' without a custom DESTDIR these days. Certainly people new to TR> > FreeBSD shouldn't be doing it; only those with the command hardwired into TR> > their brains. We've had buildworld/installworld since 2.2.5 (or 2.2.6) I TR> > think as I've only had to do a 'make world' once to go from 2.2.2 to TR> > 2.2.6. :) TR> TR> Heh, I agree, "make world" isn't really needed. But it was TR> either a quick comment about it and link to the handbook where TR> we advocate "buildworld" or remove the world target. Of course, TR> we could just do nothing and let users continue to submit PRs TR> about it bombing with a complaint of an undocumented make(1) TR> option. TR> TR> Personally, I was debating on just removing most of the TR> world target with just a message: TR> TR> "The world target has been replaced with the buildworld target." TR> TR> But stepped back due to bikeshed potential. ;) Hmm, maybe just bomb out on make'ing world without DESTDIR defined? Original behaviour would be emulated with simply DESTDIR=/ then... Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------