From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Jul 14 2:31:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from theory1.physics.iisc.ernet.in (theory1.physics.iisc.ernet.in [144.16.71.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FBA737B63D for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 02:31:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rsidd@physics.iisc.ernet.in) Received: (qmail 12253 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2000 06:23:02 -0000 Received: from theory8.physics.iisc.ernet.in (144.16.71.128) by theory1.physics.iisc.ernet.in with SMTP; 14 Jul 2000 06:23:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 826 invoked by uid 211); 14 Jul 2000 06:22:58 -0000 Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:52:58 +0530 From: Rahul Siddharthan To: James Howard Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Pet Theory for World Domination Message-ID: <20000714115258.A804@physics.iisc.ernet.in> Mail-Followup-To: James Howard , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200007132144.RAA09512@rac10.wam.umd.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <200007132144.RAA09512@rac10.wam.umd.edu>; from howardjp@wam.umd.edu on Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 05:44:47PM -0400 X-Operating-System: Linux 2.0.32 i486 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org James Howard said on Jul 13, 2000 at 17:44:47: > Now hear me out on this. I just read the OSOpinion discussion of SCO's > future and that a Linux company should buy it out. Forget that, it is a > better match for BSDi. BSDi would then have everything, including a > compiler, to build a full Unix without the GPL in the way. BSDi would I'm curious: how does SCO's compiler compare with gcc, speed-wise and optimisation-wise? What about the c++ compiler? And do they have a good fortran compiler? Anyone know? Rahul. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message