From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 08:18:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B214316A405 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:18:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634DC13C43E for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:18:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (nat-wh-1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.72.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED13440548C; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:18:26 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47BFD6D1.3020506@bsdforen.de> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:18:25 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080205) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: perryh@pluto.rain.com References: <47be74b1.pGW9HajDXl3VC5wx%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <200802221307.43940.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <47bfd2d6.EvwzDqmqdVQnRjs8%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <47bfd2d6.EvwzDqmqdVQnRjs8%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting X11BASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:18:28 -0000 perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: >>> * What is the value of LOCALBASE? I'm not finding any >>> definition, or other reference, in /etc/make.conf. >> Just set it to ${LOCALBASE} verbatim. Not what you think is the >> value of the variable LOCALBASE but the word ${LOCALBASE}. > > Academic interest :) > > I'm finding it especially "interesting" that /etc/make.conf, which > to judge from its location is part of the base, depends on a setting > from something in the /usr/ports tree. > Well, actually it doesn't. What gives you this impression?