Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 01:54:29 +0000 From: Tino Engel <elrap@web.de> To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@riderway.com> Cc: John <nesredep@gmail.com>, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper Message-ID: <473660D5.9020700@web.de> In-Reply-To: <4734D8B0.1060200@riderway.com> References: <cff9f2d10711091320q7825f190r8dc373b80155a9bd@mail.gmail.com> <4734D8B0.1060200@riderway.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > John wrote: > >> I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good >> progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do >> flash. Definite showstopper, for me. Ok, then I tried to use the >> linuxpluginwrapper approach, and it didn't work. >> >> It made me recall, in reading up on FreeBSD, I did see where somebody >> installed both Firefox and Linx-firefox. >> >> So before I do battle with this Linux wrapper approach, I wondered if I >> would be better off simply installing the Linux-firefox? >> >> Is that easier? More likely to work? >> > http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2007-07/msg01919.html > > That will work just fine using flash7. When you need flash9, thats a > different story. > > works on 6.2, 6.3, 7.0-current, 7.0-betaX, and 8.0-current. > > > Flash 9 alway causes segfault when displaying flash movie in my linux-firefox. So what am I doing wrong.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?473660D5.9020700>