From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Wed Feb 28 12:22:25 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E6FF43A5B; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 12:22:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33982747DE; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 12:22:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 2C8C3F5D4; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 12:22:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 12:22:25 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Joseph Mingrone Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r462550 - in head/editors: emacs emacs-devel Message-ID: <20180228122225.GA64252@FreeBSD.org> References: <201802212359.w1LNxi5j091573@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201802212359.w1LNxi5j091573@repo.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 12:22:25 -0000 On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:59:44PM +0000, Joseph Mingrone wrote: > New Revision: 462550 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/462550 > > Log: > Emacs ports: Remove obsolete variable definitions > > editors/emacs: The CANNA option was replaced by a flavor, so remove > CANNA_DESC. > > editors/emacs and editors/emacs-devel: The X11 option was replaced by the > nox flavor, so remove WITHOUT_X11. Ah, so `nox' is acutally related to X11? Could it be renamed to `nox11' if this is the case, as it's much less confusing than `nox'. It would also help X11/WITHOUT_X11-aware users to catch up with flavors quicker. ./danfe