From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Dec 9 1:58:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from winston.freebsd.org (adsl-64-173-15-98.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [64.173.15.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818AB37B416 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 01:58:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from winston.freebsd.org (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fB99vbq03864; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 01:57:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@winston.freebsd.org) To: Matthew Dillon Cc: Bernd Walter , Garance A Drosihn , "Louis A. Mamakos" , Sheldon Hearn , Kirk McKusick , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposed auto-sizing patch to sysinstall (was Re: Using a larger block size on large filesystems) In-Reply-To: Message from Matthew Dillon of "Sun, 09 Dec 2001 01:41:16 PST." <200112090941.fB99fGV36341@apollo.backplane.com> Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 01:57:37 -0800 Message-ID: <3839.1007891857@winston.freebsd.org> From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Sigh. Look, the whole point of 'A'uto is to create a reasonable > [rant deleted] All in your humble opinion, to be sure. I don't agree with it, however, and enough other people clearly don't agree with it that I most certainly can't see it as a -stable candidate for 4.5 as you evidently do since you have the MFC marked as a week away. It's up to the release engineers to decide, of course, but I'm just telling you now that I'll argue against it and that's probably the last we need to say about it. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message