From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 04:47:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7866316A4CE; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 04:47:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [212.192.164.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044A443D1D; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 04:47:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B5OqM-00089s-Pp; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 18:47:50 +0600 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2MCmG2a078329; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 18:48:16 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2MCmGWp078327; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 18:48:16 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 18:48:15 +0600 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Garance A Drosihn , freebsd-standards@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040322124815.GA76254@regency.nsu.ru> References: <20040322120916.GA9002@psconsult.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040322120916.GA9002@psconsult.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: PATCH for a more-POSIX `ps', and related adventures X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:47:05 -0000 On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 01:09:16PM +0100, Paul Schenkeveld wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 03:51:31PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > [this is BCC'ed to -arch so more people have a chance to see it, but > > I expect most of the discussion to happen in freebsd-standards]. > > > > ... > > Any chance this can be adapted for RELENG_4 or do you think the > ps source has changed too much between RELENG_4 and HEAD? I personally do not see that much need in putting anything more than a trivial effort in bringing this stuff to RELENG_4. 4.x is living its life out, and this change is not something that 4.x definitely must have. General practice here is most probably is: unless there's a stong reason (like security one) or it's a trivial change, don't MFC. Deed is not worth the trouble. ./danfe