From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Sep 12 12:19:50 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id MAA24686 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 12 Sep 1995 12:19:50 -0700 Received: from gilberto.physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de [137.226.31.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA24574 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 1995 12:17:47 -0700 Received: (from kuku@localhost) by gilberto.physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (8.6.11/8.6.9) id UAA00893; Tue, 12 Sep 1995 20:31:33 +0200 From: "Christoph P. Kukulies" Message-Id: <199509121831.UAA00893@gilberto.physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE> Subject: Re: No ld.so? To: LPPelletier@cmq.qc.ca (Luc Pelletier) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 1995 20:31:33 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <2235296.ensmtp@cmq.qc.ca> from "Luc Pelletier" at Sep 12, 95 02:25:42 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 511 Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Can someone tell me the meaning of the message > > No ld.so > > I'm getting when running some commands (like pwd_mkdb)? > > And how I can get around. Could you give more details? What kind of distribution did you install? ftp? CDROM? No ld.so normally means that a binary using shared libs is started and it cannot find /usr/libexec/ld.so (the shared libs loader). > > > Thanks -Luc who is just about to unlock is system :-) > --Chris Christoph P. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de