From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 23 20:48:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FBC816A402; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 20:48:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A8343D58; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 20:48:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.48.2]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA741703F; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 20:48:08 +0000 (UTC) To: Jean-Yves Lefort From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:30:49 +0200." <20060423183049.0e90ee1e.jylefort@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 22:48:07 +0200 Message-ID: <1877.1145825287@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Cc: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: multiple of sector size I/O restriction X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 20:48:10 -0000 In message <20060423183049.0e90ee1e.jylefort@FreeBSD.org>, Jean-Yves Lefort wri tes: >Do you think it would be feasible (from a performance and/or >complexity standpoint) to add the necessary magic to GEOM so that the >restriction is lifted? By default: no. But it would be possible to write a special GEOM class to offer this functionality. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.