From owner-freebsd-chromium@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 6 12:03:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: chromium@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF0A106566C for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 12:03:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from geo.liaskos@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F6678FC0A for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 12:03:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbf13 with SMTP id f13so2975325vcb.13 for ; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 05:03:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=dzbekuU12xcbcFaQzJKgQuQQtMqubaSx134VglfQxmM=; b=lwIuNCVr+vS3p98wj0gIdrU77Ifnr/AWy0JOrv1C+XX+wA0HW7J5zpD5u16jDwVlqq x8nozOh2Tbop/6rWhSaUpE4+p6KcUrwsP3Qocv6/Low0Y1XG/niVBhco7DYnuse8/suo JerEtYofNlkPIyILZh4XXp8PcAIkvGNqC0/Rs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.93.144 with SMTP id cu16mr543448vdb.281.1317902601293; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 05:03:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.148.3 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 05:03:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201110061451.05452.olevole@olevole.ru> References: <201110061451.05452.olevole@olevole.ru> Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:03:21 +0300 Message-ID: From: George Liaskos To: Oleg Ginzburg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: chromium@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CLANG and the GCC are mutually exclusive for chromium building X-BeenThere: freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Chromium issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 12:03:22 -0000 On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Oleg Ginzburg wrote: > Hi, > > it would be nice to mark in /usr/ports/www/chromium/Makefile that CLANG and the > GCC are mutually exclusive - last define wins. > > .if defined(GCC45) && defined(CLANG) > IGNORE= conflicting options (CLANG or GCC) > .endif Yes, you are absolutely correct, this was my glitch. Thank you for reporting this! Regards, George