From owner-freebsd-current Sun Nov 1 21:23:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA08362 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 1 Nov 1998 21:23:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA08350 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 1998 21:23:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id AAA18222; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 00:23:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 00:23:38 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199811020523.AAA18222@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: obrien@NUXI.com Cc: Garrett Wollman , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPv6 in -current In-Reply-To: <19981101211257.A3217@nuxi.com> References: <199811010922.LAA05107@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> <199811011929.OAA05742@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <19981101211257.A3217@nuxi.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG < said: >> I frankly don't care that much which IPv6 implementation is chosen. >> My concerns are the following: > So is sounds like those interested in IPv6 have the go-ahead to bring it > into -CURRENT. No, they don't. Read what I wrote (and you oh-so-conveniently deleted). -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message