From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 17 03:32:07 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B5B16A4CE
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 03:32:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282B943D46
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 03:32:07 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from rizzo@icir.org)
Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2HBW6RS024010;
	Wed, 17 Mar 2004 03:32:06 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org)
Received: (from rizzo@localhost)
	by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.3/Submit) id i2HBW6NV024009;
	Wed, 17 Mar 2004 03:32:06 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from rizzo)
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 03:32:06 -0800
From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@iet.unipi.it>
To: Karim Fodil-Lemelin <kfl@xiphos.ca>
Message-ID: <20040317033206.A23760@xorpc.icir.org>
References: <40575A8F.8090402@xiphos.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <40575A8F.8090402@xiphos.ca>;
	from kfl@xiphos.ca on Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 02:50:39PM -0500
cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Dummynet Limitations
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:32:07 -0000

On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 02:50:39PM -0500, Karim Fodil-Lemelin wrote:
> Hi
> 
>     This code:
> 
> <code>
>      if (pipe.delay > 10000)
>                             errx(EX_DATAERR, "delay %d must be < 10000", 
> pipe.delay);
> </code>
> 
> in /usr/src/sbin/ipfw/ipfw.c
> 
> Limits the pipe delay for dummynet to 10 seconds. Is there any reason 
> for this? Also, no such limit is imposed on the bandwidth why?
> Memory (amount of mbufs/mbclusters) is obviously a limit here but I was 
> wondering if something else was hidden in this statement.

back in 1996 when i wrote that line of code, my test machine had
16MB of RAM and i did not want to exhaust it with a poorly
configured pipe. You are certainly welcome to increase it
or even better make it into a sysctl variable.

But keep in mind that pipe.delay is the propagation delay, and i
cannot make any sense (except for simulating deep-space communications)
of a larger delay, in which case, though, communication is
so peculiar that almost surely you need a different test
environment, not something IP-based as dummynet.
Also, in such cases, you probably want to simulate things
faster than realtime -- makes no sense to send a packet
and wait hours for it to be delivered.

cheers
luigi