From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Jul 10 18:32:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from canonware.com (dsl081-058-209.dsl-isp.net [64.81.58.209]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D413537B405 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:32:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jasone@canonware.com) Received: by canonware.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EE34CC7; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:32:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:32:27 -0700 From: Jason Evans To: Keith Bostic Cc: karels@bsdi.com, arch@hub.freebsd.org Subject: Re: nvi maintainer? Message-ID: <20010710183227.D22464@canonware.com> References: <200107110118.f6B1IQE24540@abyssinian.sleepycat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200107110118.f6B1IQE24540@abyssinian.sleepycat.com>; from bostic@sleepycat.com on Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 09:18:26PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 09:18:26PM -0400, Keith Bostic wrote: > > I think that FreeBSD should leave DB 1.85 in the C library, and > when (if?) nvi finally upgrades to DB 3, simply load nvi & DB 3 > as a single executable and ship it that way. Problem solved. :-) I think most people have dropped out of the conversation at this point, having realized that your above suggestion is a perfectly acceptable way of proceeding. Let the editor wars[*] continue. Jason [*]: Emacs does the dishes for you! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message