From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 5 06:32:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1CD106566B for ; Wed, 5 May 2010 06:32:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from auryn@zirakzigil.org) Received: from mail.zirakzigil.org (mail.zirakzigil.org [82.63.178.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4553E8FC17 for ; Wed, 5 May 2010 06:32:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.1.2]) by mail.zirakzigil.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D685F978ED; Wed, 5 May 2010 08:32:16 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zirakzigil.org Received: from mail.zirakzigil.org ([192.168.1.2]) by localhost (ext.zirakzigil.org [192.168.1.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Kjm-u7K2Idw; Wed, 5 May 2010 08:32:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.229.30] (unknown [192.168.1.2]) (Authenticated sender: auryn@zirakzigil.org) by mail.zirakzigil.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 12FEA978E4; Wed, 5 May 2010 08:32:14 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4BE110E3.8040902@zirakzigil.org> Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 08:32:03 +0200 From: Giulio Ferro User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Chadwick , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <4BDEA86E.3050109@zirakzigil.org> <20100503110100.GA93137@icarus.home.lan> <4BDEC106.3040807@zirakzigil.org> In-Reply-To: <4BDEC106.3040807@zirakzigil.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Freebsd 8.0 kmem map too small X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 06:32:29 -0000 Giulio Ferro wrote: > Thanks, I'll try these settings. > > I'll keep you posted. Nope, it's happened again... Now I've tried to rise vm.kmem_size to 6G... I'm really astounded at how unstable zfs is, it's causing me a lot of problem. Why isn't it stated in the handbook that zfs isn't up to production yet?