From owner-freebsd-current Mon Sep 6 11: 3:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mail.scc.nl (node1374.a2000.nl [62.108.19.116]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8587A151CF for ; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 11:03:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-current@scc.nl) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by mail.scc.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA12746 for current@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 19:35:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd-current@scc.nl) Received: from GATEWAY by dwarf.hq.scc.nl with netnews for current@FreeBSD.ORG (current@FreeBSD.ORG) To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 19:35:01 +0200 From: Marcel Moolenaar Message-ID: <37D3FB45.BA8ED0E5@scc.nl> Organization: SCC vof Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <37D38367.C297FD64@scc.nl>, <199909061552.LAA03348@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Subject: Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Garrett Wollman wrote: > > < said: > > > Known problems: > > Building world fails because the freshly built cpp segfaults. A setjmp call > > that may be involved matches the problem of a return address being 0. gdb > > does not display a complete backtrace... > > The {,sig}setjmp buffer contains a sigset_t. The size of a JMP_BUF > needs to be large enough to make this work. Additionally, the setjmp > family currently use the old-style (sigblock/sigsetmask) signal calls, > which will have to change. Agreed. -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:marcel@scc.nl SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ The FreeBSD project mailto:marcel@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message