Date: Sat, 08 May 2021 23:01:07 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 246637] New port: irc/pounce multi-client IRC bouncer Message-ID: <bug-246637-7788-XIJ5MUO9gJ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-246637-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-246637-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246637 --- Comment #6 from june@causal.agency --- Yeah I removed the rc scripts since they were hacky and I had them in-repo which isn't where they belong. They could maybe be pulled out of git histor= y: <https://git.causal.agency/pounce/tree/rc.d?id=3Db93f3f96845fc1fa1f1b80829f= 3573a11b13b907>, although I don't think they're quite accurate anymore either since pounce n= ow wants to load configuration from ~/.config. catsit does a better job, but I guess I'm hesitant about adding an extra po= rt for a rather particular process supervisor and creating a soft dependency on it. On the other hand, it would be awkward to package pounce without a reasonable way to run it. I kind of feel like I'd be imposing on the ports = tree by requiring some special method to run my software. Really depends on how = much demand there is to run pounce on FreeBSD, I suppose. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-246637-7788-XIJ5MUO9gJ>