From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jun 2 23:36:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n0b.san.rr.com (dt051n0b.san.rr.com [204.210.32.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF6737BAF0 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 23:36:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (doug@master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051n0b.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA56099; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 23:36:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@gorean.org) Message-ID: <3938A758.CFF7DD82@gorean.org> Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2000 23:36:08 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT-0528 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Allen Lu Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Possible bug in natd on 4.0 References: <20000603052243.28059.qmail@web2105.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Allen Lu wrote: > > Well..call it bad docs..its not a bug. > > I got natd to work because I was curious to see if I had to use use_socket and > same_port in /etc/natd.conf. YES you do. That helped to pass my packets to the > internet. It depends on what services you're running, or trying to use. I've run natd for years without either option. -- "Live free or die" - State motto of my ancestral homeland, New Hampshire Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message