From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Jan 9 04:14:02 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA23774 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Sat, 9 Jan 1999 04:14:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from phoenix.welearn.com.au (phoenix.welearn.com.au [139.130.44.81] (may be forged)) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA23760 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 1999 04:13:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sue@phoenix.welearn.com.au) Received: (from sue@localhost) by phoenix.welearn.com.au (8.9.1/8.9.0) id XAA11465; Sat, 9 Jan 1999 23:13:12 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <19990109231308.32498@welearn.com.au> Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 23:13:08 +1100 From: Sue Blake To: "Jan B. Koum " Cc: Greg Lehey , Owen Barnett , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenBSD vs. FreeBSD References: <19990108230358.A19973@best.com> <19990109212815.B1743@freebie.lemis.com> <19990109035423.A13514@best.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e In-Reply-To: <19990109035423.A13514@best.com>; from Jan B. Koum on Sat, Jan 09, 1999 at 03:54:23AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Jan 09, 1999 at 03:54:23AM -0800, Jan B. Koum wrote: > On Sat, Jan 09, 1999 at 09:28:16PM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote: > > On Friday, 8 January 1999 at 23:03:58 -0800, Jan B. Koum wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 09, 1999 at 12:52:09AM -0600, Owen Barnett wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> I've been using FreeBSD now for a few months, but have recently read a > > >> little about OpenBSD. All the sources I've read seem to indicate OpenBSD > > >> as superior in security issues and FreeBSD in performance issues and > > >> perhaps "friendliness" - I was wondering, if anyone has had experience > > >> with both, what are the tradeoffs between each system? > > > > > > FreeBSD is as secure as OpenBSD. One can argue it is even > > > more secure as OpenBSD was the last OS out of the two to have > > > local 'get root' type vulnerability. Security also depends a > > > lot on the admin of the system. > > > > I think this is rather a blanket statement. OpenBSD has a stated aim > > of being particularly secure. I can't say whether they come closer to > > this goal than FreeBSD, but you can't put them down on the basis of a > > single datum. > > Likewise you can't claim the OS is secure based on a hype or a > statement. > > > > > > But you are right - FreeBSD wins in the performance area > > > no questions asked. > > > > I disagree. I would ask questions, or at least answer implied > > questions. There's been enough unpleasantness between the *BSDs in > > the past; we don't want to start that again with a number of > > unqualified statements, even if they should be correct. > > You do not think FreeBSD is better in the performance > area? This is a simple yes or no question. :) Some people prefer to be appropriate, while others prefer to be simple. -- Regards, -*Sue*- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message