Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 11:27:47 +0100 From: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk> To: Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org>, feld@freebsd.org Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Stable" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: lots of security advisories rehashed Message-ID: <D70F301D-4A1E-4670-89AC-0EFECFE5543C@gid.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <53ac6f2d-445e-7262-4b31-62393d7a6bf4@freebsd.org> References: <86d23401-db6c-29bd-d537-7146686b08f2@menhennitt.com.au> <20160812112330.GE96200@home.opsec.eu> <53ac6f2d-445e-7262-4b31-62393d7a6bf4@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, > On 12 Aug 2016, at 13:16, Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org> wrote: >=20 > [=E2=80=A6] > Note that these are capturing the last several years worth of security > advisories for the base system into VuXML. This allows you to say, = for > instance: >=20 > pkg audit FreeBSD-10.3_2 >=20 > which will tell you about a number of security advisories which have > come out since 10.3-RELEASE-p2. This is in anticipation of the base > system being packaged, which is due to come in with 11.1-RELEASE. >=20 > See Mark Felder's announcement on questions@: Why is this hiding out on questions@ ? > = https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2016-August/273034.h= tml >=20 > As Mark says, this is not guaranteed to be either accurate or = complete, > but it should be helpful in managing system upgrades. >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Matthew >=20 >=20 -- Bob Bishop rb@gid.co.uk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D70F301D-4A1E-4670-89AC-0EFECFE5543C>