From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 16 12:17:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C513216A4CE for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 12:17:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (ol.freeshell.org [192.94.73.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 715ED43D45 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 12:17:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pieckiel@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:pieckiel@sverige.freeshell.org [192.94.73.4]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8GCH46R001237 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 12:17:04 GMT Received: (from pieckiel@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id i8GCH4YH016743 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 08:17:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 08:17:04 -0400 From: "Kevin A. Pieckiel" To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040916121704.GA29643@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: PR kern/67636 closed, but still not working? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 12:17:06 -0000 I have a 5.2.1-RELEASE computer that does work, and a 5.3-BETA4 computer that doesn't. Both have custom kernels that do NOT include IPv6. I'm trying to set up IPF on the 5.3-BETA4 computer, but I get the very error message in PR kern/67636: Inability to use ipfilter module (ipl.ko) with custom kernels w/o INET6 # kldload ipl kldload: can't load ipl: No such file or directory # dmesg|tail -1 link_elf: symbol in6_cksum undefined This PR has been closed. Did it not apply to HEAD or the current branch? Can someone apply the patch into CURRENT? This PR was rated with a severity of "serious". This functionality would be nice for 5.3-RELEASE. Thanks, Kevin