From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue May 23 18:22:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from bingnet2.cc.binghamton.edu (bingnet2.cc.binghamton.edu [128.226.1.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7253B37BAC5 for ; Tue, 23 May 2000 18:22:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from zzhang@cs.binghamton.edu) Received: from sol.cs.binghamton.edu (sol.cs.binghamton.edu [128.226.123.100]) by bingnet2.cc.binghamton.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA16068; Tue, 23 May 2000 21:22:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 21:21:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Zhihui Zhang To: Joy Ganguly Cc: freebsd-hackers Subject: Re: blocks and fragments??? In-Reply-To: <392AED2F.582FC379@falcon.niksun.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If a fragment address refers to a fragment at a block boundary, then it is also called a block address. -Zhihui > hi all, > > do disk addresses in struct dinode ( di_db[] array) address block > addresses or fragment addresses?? the comment in dinode.h says they are > block addresses. but fs.h says addresses are capable of addressing > fragments. will somebody please explain this?? > > thanx all > > joy > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message