From owner-cvs-include Fri Dec 6 09:57:12 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id JAA02684 for cvs-include-outgoing; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 09:57:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id JAA02661; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 09:57:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <19984(1)>; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 09:55:56 PST Received: from localhost by crevenia.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <177711>; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 09:38:48 -0800 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-include@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include utmp.h In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Dec 96 11:06:14 PST." <9893.849812774@time.cdrom.com> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 1996 09:38:46 PST From: Bill Fenner Message-Id: <96Dec6.093848pst.177711@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> Sender: owner-cvs-include@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <9893.849812774@time.cdrom.com> you write: >Simple questions: Is there concensus for bumping UT_HOSTSIZE to the >next increment? 32 or 64? Oh, and UT_HOSTSIZE should be at least 40 (the size of a maximum-length numerically represented IPv6 address) and doesn't have any real need to be a power of 2; it might be more appropriate to make it the right length to make a "struct utmp" a power of 2 long. Bill