From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul 29 13:13:40 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B350016A41F
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:13:40 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from the.lists@mgm51.com)
Received: from oneyou.mcmli.com (oneyou.mcmli.com [216.194.67.64])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C14443D48
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:13:40 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from the.lists@mgm51.com)
Received: from sentry.24cl.com (pcp01267574pcs.danbry01.ct.comcast.net
	[68.63.157.203])
	by oneyou.mcmli.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9FF5B86
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:13:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from XPMM (unknown [63.119.50.193])
	by sentry.24cl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB4E50ED
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:13:38 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <200507290913490593.03B78D69@sentry.24cl.com>
In-Reply-To: <200507281157.42688.bob89@eng.ufl.edu>
References: <200507281157.42688.bob89@eng.ufl.edu>
X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.00.1081 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (P)
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:13:49 -0400
From: "MikeM" <the.lists@mgm51.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: defragmentation in FreeBSD 4.11
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:13:40 -0000

On 7/28/2005 at 11:57 AM Bob Johnson wrote:

|Microsoft used to claim that NTFS doesn't need defragmentation.  
|Compared to MSDOSFS, that's a reasonably accurate statement, but 
|if you push it hard enough, it will still become fragmented.
 =============

The process of installing Windows on a clean disk leaves the disk in
need of defragmenting.