From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 13 08:00:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A135D1065670 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 08:00:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saeedeh.motlagh@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208918FC0A for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 08:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhj6 with SMTP id hj6so4001928wib.13 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:00:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=3NJyisUxtCib/H7CTvGB/IrrmANP95WzgfWc4uXLoOA=; b=JtN+YabFMIC1KEzFKUOyBmSYT4XKF4x1tFIcMHsw3V0/RQKkJmE1MY7jSY0VluwOpA IsM2D549hegb9IS4lDPXiGkUG42v7fQM0olPral/sRuTUA5THsp894/s+5MatIFhTdxY 9NVM9N07Xb/vGhc33vmbrmQwka4+deSa24+w30m1uPSBWdjoyMQi6ioLfL+yGCOlGvmO vB3c05OcQfUtVp7fE/X/UoCvP2Imshukg+u3tvjkWWQAMbRVVJTJuNDrWrHPYzpGi+xA EY7JJInBza4AgfwwdjqmCc02Xcq16dRtd8NeWtK/yB5HVDNqqm0vu4Jhj0gEfVM9o/Rv kPlw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.86.230 with SMTP id s6mr4937339wiz.16.1331625601282; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.75.26 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:00:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120305084359.GA56606@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20120305222811.GA64183@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20120306074655.GA71641@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:30:01 +0330 Message-ID: From: saeedeh motlagh To: h bagade , freebsd-net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: problem with vlan interfaces tagging/untagging in a simulated switch box X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 08:00:02 -0000 i think i have similar problem too. you want to have tagged and untagged traffic at the same time on the trunk port, right? in your topology the vlans and trunk port are bridged and the tagged traffic is passed through the trunk port and every thing works fine. then when you want to have the untagged traffic on the trunk port, you bridge an interface with trunk port directly. after that all the traffic which is received on the trunk port, are sent to this interface and vlans receive no packet. eth0 -+ | eth1 -+ --- bridge1 --- vlan9 --+-- eth4 ----- | eth2 -+ --- bridge2 --- vlan8 --+ --------+ | eth3 -+ ------------ bridge3 ----------------+ please let me know if i understand what you exactly mean. yours,