From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 19:25:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C38716A4CE; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 19:25:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A5E943D39; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 19:25:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BA40C5128D; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:25:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:25:42 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Mathieu Arnold Message-ID: <20050108192542.GB68193@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050108155045.568E716A4D0@hub.freebsd.org> <2408A9749ABBBCC666386CDE@cc-147.int.t-online.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2408A9749ABBBCC666386CDE@cc-147.int.t-online.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Sergey Matveychuk Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/chinese/BBMan Makefile ports/chinese/CJK Makefile ports/chinese/arnettf Makefile ports/chinese/arphicttf Makefile ports/chinese/auto-tw-l10n Makefile ports/chinese/bg5pdf Makefile ports/chinese/big5fs Makefile ports/chinese/chinput3 ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 19:25:43 -0000 --4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 04:58:33PM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > +-le 08/01/2005 15:50 +0000, Sergey Matveychuk ?crivait : > | Log: > | - Pass maintainership to submitter >=20 > I fail to see the point of such a commit, I mean, without any update to t= he > ports. Giving a port to someone making an update is good, but giving a wh= ole > bunch of ports just for giving them is doing no good I think. It gives me someone I can send my pointyhat logs to, so the ports don't just sit around all broken and sad. Kris --4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB4DO2Wry0BWjoQKURApMAAKDUjgv+qwNVS6EcUeOleF6w6g+KcwCePVWu kZZa8cEtLgq0fA9SfV7iAlA= =b+fB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H--