From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 19 03:30:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DA2106566B for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:30:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078D28FC16 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:30:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 18 Oct 2009 23:30:51 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.10.7-GA) with ESMTP id LES01941; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:30:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-6-22-227.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.227]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 18 Oct 2009 23:30:50 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19163.56681.724615.44106@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:30:49 -0400 To: Glen Barber In-Reply-To: <4ad871310910181916q655dec06k72b1e7577751751e@mail.gmail.com> References: <20091019013337.GA9522@thought.org> <20091019040229.b4e11bbc.freebsd@edvax.de> <4ad871310910181916q655dec06k72b1e7577751751e@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Polytropon , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: need C help, passing char buffer[] by-value.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:30:52 -0000 Glen Barber writes: > >> // redo, skip TAGS > > > > Is this C or C++ source code? I always thought // was C++ > > specific... > > > > "//" comments are recognized by both C and C++. How about "... are recognized by both C++ and more recent versions of C."? Robert Huff