Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 10:21:48 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> To: Murray Stokely <murray@freebsdmall.com> Cc: hubs@FreeBSD.org, rab@freebsdmall.com Subject: Re: i386 vs amd64 ISO download statistics/trends Message-ID: <20061018082148.GF71000@droso.net> In-Reply-To: <20061018001438.GD29765@freebsdmall.com> References: <20061018001438.GD29765@freebsdmall.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--684cmtc/Pyvt2LSS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 05:14:38PM -0700, Murray Stokely wrote: > Greetings FTP Admins, I'm curious about the relative download > popularity of FreeBSD 6.1 i386 and amd64 ISO images. Can those of you > with logs post the complete download numbers for i386 and amd64 iso > images from your sites? Would be much appreciated, thanks. >=20 $ grep IMAGES xfer.2006101? | grep 6.1-RELEASE | grep -c amd64 2408 $ grep IMAGES xfer.2006101? | grep 6.1-RELEASE | grep -c i386 17376 This is for the last 7 days for the danish half of ftp.freebsd.org. Let me know if you want some more finegrained info. Cheers, -erwin --=20 Erwin Lansing http://droso.org Security is like an onion. (o_ _o) It's made up of several layers \\\_\ /_/// erwin@FreeBSD.org And it makes you cry. <____) (____> erwin@aauug.dk --684cmtc/Pyvt2LSS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFNeQcqy9aWxUlaZARAv+GAJ4tEttD5oJksyp3QCOsnEnrTOvmEwCgwhia USv4urBZKf+IoN4eMKzD2pI= =8JMJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --684cmtc/Pyvt2LSS--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061018082148.GF71000>