From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 3 16:21:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC7A106564A; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 16:21:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from seanbru@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from mrout2-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com (mrout2-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.253.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249278FC12; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 16:21:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (rideseveral.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.160.231]) by mrout2-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id q93GL6mZ009136; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 09:21:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1349281268; bh=m0izu1CzRooeeXUFV0PE5fFj+KoS/nHHUF1n5MtP55E=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-ID:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=vbKUCTB/XD5l9Mltj1wn2NXpIbjOK6Y4GzJdd9KatZrgcrjzu8eQAzPK9u8kFGsug UhOzp2XYMR7+sqrDbxzWiehiHGOAg0vq4O8kX4Dp1BLaxsfTio8eDD4qPHQ+80UdjR Zs+9PuqjrUVYeEkWJhO0q9glJJCVY4gfjqTr3FCM= From: Sean Bruno To: Andriy Gapon In-Reply-To: <506C38CE.4090400@FreeBSD.org> References: <504EDBEB.6010104@FreeBSD.org> <1349198313.4246.3.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> <506C38CE.4090400@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 09:21:06 -0700 Message-ID: <1349281266.13749.0.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Milter-Version: master.31+4-gbc07cd5+ X-CLX-ID: 281267004 Cc: "sbruno@FreeBSD.org" , "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: notify userland about C-state changes X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 16:21:41 -0000 On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 06:08 -0700, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > > So quick question, does this happen a lot on a system with a > sporadic > > workload? Does this introduce overhead to the system to service the > > notification requests? > > I am not sure who can answer this question. It is up to ACPI platform > to decide > when it changes _available C-states_. OS doesn't have control over > that. > Hrm ... what changes to the machine would make this happen while the machine is running? things like the switching from battery to line power? > P.S. I hope you haven't confused this notification for a notification > about > _current_ C-state changing. I did have it confused. Thanks for putting this note in. Sean