Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 6 Sep 2012 12:02:39 -0700
From:      David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Ian Lepore <freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org>
Cc:        Arthur Mesh <arthurmesh@gmail.com>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Mark Murray <markm@freebsd.org>, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r239598 - head/etc/rc.d
Message-ID:  <20120906190239.GG13179@dragon.NUXI.org>
In-Reply-To: <1346951961.59094.158.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
References:  <201208222337.q7MNbORo017642@svn.freebsd.org> <5043E449.8050005@FreeBSD.org> <20120904220126.GA85339@dragon.NUXI.org> <50468326.8070009@FreeBSD.org> <20120906164514.GA14757@dragon.NUXI.org> <1346951961.59094.158.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:19:21AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> The kenv application may be available, but on any platform that
> lacks /boot/loader it's likely to produce empty output.  Because the
> kernel environment is typically empty, an embedded system may not even
> have the kenv binary installed.  

The FreeBSD kernel expects to be loaded by /boot/loader and for it to
provided a suitable environment.

If one has chosen to not use /boot/loader (or include 'kenv' on their
embedded boot media), they're already gone so far down the path of
customization that hacking 'initrandom' should be expected.


> I should note that I don't think the needs of embedded systems should
> carry so much weight in this discussion that it leads to jumping through
> major hoops.

:-)

> I think the most important point would be "Let failures be
> soft ones" -- things you may think of as basic tools always available on
> a minimal installation may not be there on a stripped down embedded
> system; no big deal, just don't hang the system or anything else dire in
> that case.

I think that just adds to needless cruft in /etc/rc.d scripts that is
hard to test and keep working -- as committers will 99.9999% time be
in a full FreeBSD environment.

I don't want to see every command in better_than_nothing() turn into
"test -x ___ && ___".

-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120906190239.GG13179>