Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 17:18:49 +0100 From: Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org> To: Guangyuan Yang <ygy@freebsd.org> Cc: ports-committers <ports-committers@freebsd.org>, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 692cca400331 - main - www/grafana: Mark DEPRECATED and set expiration date Message-ID: <9a08aec3-468e-cd50-c326-1decb1920b38@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CABBk%2B3pK3=_z8LdGpJdJu3OdnUmE5qCrqYROaFQ5wm27ccHpqQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <202111162156.1AGLuv0P058897@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <7130c8b4-fed4-7e7e-cf5d-4ece5c82fc2e@FreeBSD.org> <CABBk%2B3pK3=_z8LdGpJdJu3OdnUmE5qCrqYROaFQ5wm27ccHpqQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 17/11/2021 06:21, Guangyuan Yang wrote: > Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@freebsd.org> 于2021年11月16日周二 下午5:15写道： >> On 16/11/2021 22:56, Guangyuan Yang wrote: >>> commit 692cca4003317a6c83fa226feccab3e5ec47ab52 ... >>> www/grafana: Mark DEPRECATED and set expiration date >>> >>> Grafana 1 is no longer maintained upstream years ago. Mark DEPRECATED >>> after the next quarterly cycle. >>> >>> PR: 257763 >>> Approved by: robak (maintainer, timeout > 3 months) >> Are there any technical reasons why we shouldn't update www/grafana to provide the most recent >> Grafana version? > I have actually raised this option as well in the PR (257763), but > after months of maintainer timeout, I just decided to take the easier > route. I think www/grafana tracking the latest Grafana version is a > good idea, but the implementation can be a new slave port tracking > www/grafana8, or ideally have the same maintainer of www/grafana8. I > currently do not have extra cycles for it though, so the first thing > is to stop the confusion that www/grafana currently causes. Thank you for the explanation. I guess that this project then is up grabs.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9a08aec3-468e-cd50-c326-1decb1920b38>