From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Sep 26 10:47:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from gamma.root-servers.ch (gamma.root-servers.ch [195.49.62.126]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C785737B430 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 10:47:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 74820 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2001 17:47:31 -0000 Received: from dclient217-162-128-224.hispeed.ch (HELO athlon550) (217.162.128.224) by 0 with SMTP; 26 Sep 2001 17:47:31 -0000 Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 19:51:31 +0200 From: Gabriel Ambuehl X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53bis) Educational Organization: BUZ Internet Services X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <187172118202.20010926195131@buz.ch> To: Rob Andrews Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re[2]: FreeBSD a good choice for high performance webservers? In-Reply-To: <20010926123312.A51520@switchblade.cyberpunkz.org> References: <60164745040.20010926174838@buz.ch> <20010926095640.C86198@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010926123312.A51520@switchblade.cyberpunkz.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hello Rob, Wednesday, September 26, 2001, 7:33:12 PM, you wrote: >> Be careful what you assume is "obvious"..I seem to recall there >> being performance problems with that design model. >> > I don't get this.. There would be other concerns with linux on the > whole in regard to security issues as well as tcp/ip issues. Sure. I was just referring to the whole point of FreeBSD being THE server OS on X86 so it probably should be able to serve webpages (as that is the main job for a server in most people's view) better than almost anything else, no? > I mean I still have > a hard time grasping linux as a serious operating system when > little things like how "far" away localhost is keep coming to mind. Would you care to elaborate? > not to mention the little to no real auditing of code. ACK. Main reason we use FreeBSD. There are a number of nifty features I miss in it compared to Linux but still, the added security and the sane development model (as apposed to Linux which hasn't even got one) weigh this up. > Performance just isn't a big enough issue since there is not that > much of a gain or loss in one direction or another to be any cause > for alarm. You know it and I know it. But the press won't care. What do you think would happen if someone found a remote root hole in OpenBSD? Exactly. Best regards, Gabriel 8]4€L- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5i iQEVAwUBO7IHlsZa2WpymlDxAQGvEwf/e/ZWCiCNG0GJI9vQfw1MtQ3vJlv2cbcc bHAW98xB1dK7hwLHuoNoNaVN0Qx0BKwOB7hEXn5kuzWpAAyd0moOTBpwnWY4+AQH Rdw0akAPAJPd16Atrn5chp+C/08Yzxkn8/99n7n7OQSEufTK26Zj1RIfVtlgWFhO bM5k3HTAsQ2xd3N2G/yaZJFzIid4hesf6FluXL0hHIyPog/e4C3SC3I3kfUw/C2S 4NneeetguE/MP3zkp5gUJvUFXodaq9RehUZTaP04+T/CTaHHYkkEIQPvbakATQG6 kun8yi8D8Nm0cdBNJakWMEPCV9L8EeDrd5FYrt6c/JvLyUqa56diLw== =xq9j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message