From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 26 10:52:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC9737B404 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 10:52:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from net1.gendyn.com (gate1.gendyn.com [204.60.171.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 784D943F93 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 10:52:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com) Received: from [153.11.11.3] (helo=ebnext01) by net1.gendyn.com with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 18yG0T-0000yx-00 for arch@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 13:52:13 -0500 Received: from clcrtr.gdeb.com ([153.11.109.11]) by ebnext01 with SMTP id h2QIqAt8022990; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 13:52:10 -0500 Received: from vigrid.com (gpz.clc.gdeb.com [192.168.3.12]) by clcrtr.gdeb.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id h2O32Bq03378; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 22:02:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com) Sender: eghk@clcrtr.gdeb.com Message-ID: <3E81F6BB.BFFE3F33@vigrid.com> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 13:51:39 -0500 From: Daniel Eischen X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.9 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: arch@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) cc: kse@elischer.org Subject: Not providing static libraries (libkse/libpthread) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 18:52:27 -0000 Is there a good reason for providing static libraries for libpthread/libkse? I'd like to not support them to get rid of some hacks to make sure certain symbols are present in the static library case. -- Dan Eischen