From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Oct  8 18:01:22 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA8016A412;
	Sun,  8 Oct 2006 18:01:22 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net)
Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com
	[81.104.168.108])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D6E43D55;
	Sun,  8 Oct 2006 18:01:21 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net)
Received: from ceri by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <ceri@submonkey.net>)
	id 1GWcxk-000AHE-LB; Sun, 08 Oct 2006 19:01:20 +0100
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 19:01:20 +0100
From: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>
To: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
Message-ID: <20061008180120.GX21333@submonkey.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>,
	Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>, maho@freebsd.org,
	freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
References: <200610081720.k98HKkQx058984@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<20061008215308.W89071@mp2.macomnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7d9k4kQHj3EPdFyS"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20061008215308.W89071@mp2.macomnet.net>
X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Sender: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>
Cc: maho@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/85820: 1.5 times slower performance with SCHED_ULE than
	SCHED_4BSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform <freebsd-amd64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 18:01:22 -0000


--7d9k4kQHj3EPdFyS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 09:54:53PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, 17:20-0000, Ceri Davies wrote:
>=20
> > Synopsis: 1.5 times slower performance with SCHED_ULE than SCHED_4BSD
> >
> > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> > State-Changed-By: ceri
> > State-Changed-When: Sun Oct 8 17:19:36 UTC 2006
> > State-Changed-Why:
> > ULE is no longer the default scheduler, and no longer has a maintainer.
> > This is an interesting test case though.
>=20
> I think better mark ULE bugs as suspended.  I have plans to take them
> over.

I don't intend to sweep them all.  I just didn't see a problem statement
in this PR, and figured that it was due to the fact that ULE was default
at the time the PR was raised.

Feel free to reopen it if you disagree.

Ceri
--=20
That must be wonderful!  I don't understand it at all.
                                                  -- Moliere

--7d9k4kQHj3EPdFyS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFKTzwocfcwTS3JF8RAn8JAJ0Y06NqI0yDOr/YFLSsAO//ldtSigCcCvw6
9WwNv8cjuH4CC7y1aTWo1X4=
=TjpD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--7d9k4kQHj3EPdFyS--