From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 01:20:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A6D16A401 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 01:20:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from kientzle.com (h-66-166-149-50.snvacaid.covad.net [66.166.149.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D760713C45E for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 01:20:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from [10.0.0.222] (p54.kientzle.com [66.166.149.54]) by kientzle.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l2C1Kw24096872; Sun, 11 Mar 2007 17:20:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <45F4AAFA.1020908@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 18:20:58 -0700 From: Tim Kientzle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060422 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <200703111036.l2BAaha6031394@repoman.freebsd.org> <45F46291.4090209@freebsd.org> <20070312001026.GA20000@xor.obsecurity.org> <45F4A1F4.4060703@freebsd.org> <20070312010532.GA21000@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070312010532.GA21000@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSDtar performance vs GNUtar (Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/tar Makefile bsdtar.c bsdtar.h bsdtar_platform.h config_freebsd.h getdate.y matching.c read.c tree.c util.c write.c src/usr.bin/tar/test config.sh test-acl.sh test-basic.sh test-deep-dir.sh test-flags.sh test-nodump.sh ...) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 01:20:59 -0000 >>>... gtar bitch a bit about unknown options (SCHILY.*) ... >> >>bsdtar should probably warn about unknown options as well; >>I'll have to look into that. > > This was an archive created by bsdtar, so they shouldn't have been > unknown to it :) Yes, but the GNU tar folks, in particular, have introduced a bunch of new options just in the last year, so bsdtar is increasingly likely to see options it doesn't know. For example, I should add support for the new GNU tar sparse file format soon. Tim