From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Feb 6 08:58:20 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA27829 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sat, 6 Feb 1999 08:58:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rio.pii.com (rio.pii.com [192.77.209.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA27823 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 1999 08:58:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robertc@rio.pii.com) Received: from localhost (robertc@localhost) by rio.pii.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA22896; Sat, 6 Feb 1999 09:30:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 6 Feb 1999 09:30:10 -0800 (PST) From: Robert Clark To: Mark Ovens cc: rssh@grad.kiev.ua, Greg Lehey , "Dan O'Connor" , Randall Senn , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, webmaster@linux.org, www@openbsd.org Subject: Re: Unix vs unix-like and unix-type In-Reply-To: <36BC4C50.B2AE6489@uk.radan.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I think they've changed their name to Interix or something like that. I'm sure they were tired of the Ninja-Attack-Lawyers going after them for putting "NT" in their company name. I ran OpenNT for about one day. It is the only piece of software I've ever run under NT that can so thoroughly wedge a system. It feels really wrong to slap a *POSIX-Adapter* on top of the dubious NT *kernel* and think of it as UNIX. I think the ROSS sparcplug aproach is the best. On an unrelated note, I see a mention that the new Linux kernel may feature support for a graphical console. (aka without X) I'd love to see a *BSD based OS with a tightly bound graphical interface, that doesn't carry the *X* baggage. If it doesn't happen, has anyone out there taken a good look into "Be"? I'm hoping its not just a matter of a disgruntled ex-Apple employee taking the MAC braindamage into the streets. [RC] On Sat, 6 Feb 1999, Mark Ovens wrote: > Ruslan Shevchenko wrote: > > > > It was not NT, but OpenNT -- NT + new posix subsystem. > > > > look at http://www.opennt.com for details (sorry, I have no > > time to check this URL, so it can be incorrect). > > > > I've just tried to take a look. It's a valid URL, but guess what? I got > a message "No response. The server may be down.....". :-) > > Now what were we saying about NT and stability? > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > -- > Q. How many Software Engineers does it take to change a light bulb? > A. None. It's a hardware problem. > > FreeBSD - The Power To Serve http://www.freebsd.org > My Webpage http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~markov > _______________________________________________________________ > Mark Ovens, CNC Apps Engineer, Radan Computational Ltd. Bath UK > CAD/CAM solutions for Sheetmetal Working Industry > mailto:marko@uk.radan.com http://www.radan.com > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message