From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 23 06:41:23 2012
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id 2CD5E1065672; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 06:41:23 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 06:41:23 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20120123064123.GC19285@FreeBSD.org>
References: <CAF6rxg=Wnh90=Nr0iuaz_HjWfenavuq1FqAHJ6Q3KpQs4sUrHA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F1C897E.1050805@FreeBSD.org>
	<CAF6rxgnNy+_6FX0e0byGdUX-yQOsHufB+41G-UF4dwebh6kccQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgnNy+_6FX0e0byGdUX-yQOsHufB+41G-UF4dwebh6kccQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: ohauer@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org,
	Ports Management Team <portmgr@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/multimedia/acidrip Makefile
	ports/math/algotutor Makefile ports/sysutils/apt Makefile
	ports/graphics/asciio Makefile ports/devel/autodia Makefile
	ports/www/awffull Makefile ports/devel/bazaar Makefile
	ports/www/bigbluebutton Mak
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree
	<cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 06:41:23 -0000

On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 06:35:36PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
> > Maybe the following section in the PH will make things clearer.
> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-depend.html#AEN2173
> 
> If I understand portmgr@ correctly this paragraph is bogus and should
> read, "instead explicitly list the dependancies".

What's exactly bogus about it, may I ask, as the author of it?

./danfe